California’s Senators have looked into the homelessness crisis, proposing $2 billion to build or rehabilitate permanent housing for mentally ill people living on the streets.
Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León, speaking with a bipartisan group of elected leaders, also called for $200 million over four years for temporary rent subsidies to bridge the gap until the new housing is completed. Officials estimated the construction funds, combined with federal and local money, it could generate 10,000 to 14,000 units for California’s 116,000 homeless people, more than 60% of whom live outdoors.
The funding proposal is the most sweeping from the state in a generation, officials said and reflects elected leaders’ growing frustration with local politicians, particularly in Los Angeles, who have failed to gain traction in the drive to help the state’s most destitute residents.
Former Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), who joined De León at the news conference, said he is “absolutely” frustrated with the inadequate response to homelessness by local governments, but he hopes an infusion of state funding will begin to address the problem.
“The problem is getting worse everywhere,” he said in Sacramento on Monday. “At the same time we know what works.”
Los Angeles city and county have the most chronically homeless people in the nation, and homelessness overall grew 12% from 2013 to 2015. Many advocates expect another jump in numbers, when homeless people again are counted, despite unprecedented spending by local and federal officials last year.
“L.A. has the unfortunate distinction of being the country’s homeless capital,” De León said at a morning news conference at a skid row homeless housing project. Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis, state Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), Assemblyman Miguel Santiago (D-Los Angeles) and Sen. Bob Huff (R-San Dimas) also spoke in support of the proposal.
“Here we are in skid row Los Angeles, not up in Sacramento, doing everything to make a serious effort to help those who need it the most,” De León said.
The senators’ proposal calls for the state to issue $2 billion in bonds, which would be repaid over 20 to 30 years with money provided under Proposition 63, the “millionaires’ tax” for mental health services that voters approved in 2004. The $200 million would come from the state’s general fund.
While some Proposition 63 money has gone to mentally ill homeless people and housing, it is nothing on the scale, said Gary Blasi, a retired UCLA law professor, and homelessness expert, now with Public Counsel’s Opportunity Under Law nonprofit law center.
Downtown leaders and homeless advocates applauded the senators’ initiative.
“Solving our homelessness crisis requires an all-hands-on-deck approach and financial support from the state is essential to getting people off the street and into homes,” Garcetti said in a statement.
“Any directives by the state could undermine this expansion effort and delay progress being made in their own unique communities,” Antonovich said in a statement. Some of the $400 million in Proposition 63 money the county received this year goes to housing, but it also funds a range of mental health services, including crisis intervention and transition programs for people coming out of locked psychiatric facilities.
Both Brown and Assembly Democrats said they welcomed De León’s focus on homelessness but stopped short of embracing the plan.
“The administration is supportive of efforts to empower local governments to tackle homelessness, poverty, and mental health issues in our communities and we will take a close look at the proposals in this package,” Brown deputy press spokeswoman Deborah Hoffman said in a statement.
Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins (D-San Diego), who has pushed for more affordable housing, said she was looking forward to seeing the details.
“Happy to start the year on the same page in making homelessness a top priority,” Atkins said in a statement.
The new units would operate on a “housing first” model, taking in homeless people with mental illness and drug and alcohol problems even if they refuse psychiatric or substance abuse treatment, officials said.
Some funding still goes to housing with sobriety or treatment requirements, advocates said.
“The evidence is overwhelming that people with serious health problems cannot successfully deal with those problems while living on the streets,” Blasi said.
The senators also proposed additional financial support for families on welfare facing or in danger of homelessness, and an increase in the state’s supplemental security income payments to 1.3 million elderly, blind and disabled poor people who cannot work. The additional programs would cost $100 million or more, an official said.
Theresa Winkler said at the news conference that she lived on the streets most of her life, turning to prostitution and using drugs before finding sobriety and a place to live with one of skid row’s nonprofit housing providers.
“It’s not fun for people, particularly women, to lie in the dirt,” she said. “By having housing, my life has been given a purpose.”
Here at Project WeHope we offer programs that teach skill sets that may open opportunities for stable employment. We having programs that work hand in hand as a process for securing a permanently housed living situation. Our Transitional Supportive Housing program comes full circle with ensuring that the individual doesn’t have to do it alone, and we are here to assist them and support them into a more secure permanent living situation. That’s how we help. Find out how you can help by contacting us at firstname.lastname@example.org, giving us a call at 650-330-8000 or writing a letter which you can send to P.O. BOX 50624, Palo Alto, CA 94303.
Summarized by: Carnell Simon